maesn
Clockin
Time Tracking

Clockin creates invoices in the accounting system each customer already runs.

Clockin's users log their hours on a building site, on a care round or behind a counter. What has to happen next is office work: the tracked time has to become an invoice, and it has to become one inside the accounting system that customer already books in.

Clockin made its integrations a reason customers come to it

We use Maesn to successfully leverage integrations and partnerships as a key driver for lead generation and expansion into new markets and customer segments. By connecting Clockin to our customers' accounting systems, project data flows directly into their existing tools, ensuring a smooth, reliable data exchange with the systems they already use.
Fabian Ebbert
CSO, Clockin
Key facts

Who Clockin is, and where Maesn sits in it

As published on the case study, unless noted
Website
clockin.de
About Clockin
Founded in Münster in 2018. More than 8.500 businesses across more than 50 industries run on clockin, and in September 2025 the company raised a 10 million EUR Series A led by Newion and NRW.Venture.Source: clockin.de
Use case
Project-related invoices out of tracked working hours. The study names what has to travel with them: customer data, line items, prices with VAT and order numbers. The workflow itself, independent of any one customer, is on the invoice creation page.
Previous solution
Manual creation of invoices in the accounting system.
Accounting systems
Sage Active, Lexware Office and sevdesk
Endpoints
Post InvoiceGet CustomersGet Suppliers
The problem

The accounting system changes with every customer Clockin adds

Clockin sells to small and mid-sized businesses, and each one books in whatever accounting product it already had. How many systems Clockin has to reach is set by its customers, not by its own size.

The published study gives the reason in one line: such a wide variety of tools in use, from Sage to international platforms, that building the integrations in-house was unrealistic. That variety is a property of the customer base rather than a phase Clockin could grow out of. Its own site counts more than 50 industries, from trade businesses and care services to physio practices and restaurants, and the accounting product was in place in each of them before Clockin was: the previous solution the study names is a person keying the invoice into it by hand.

The shape of the problem is the opposite of an enterprise one. Instead of a few large installations there are many small ones, and every business that switches the integration on is its own account in its own accounting system, with its own consent to obtain and its own connection to keep working. Unified authentication is the part of Maesn that carries that, so growing the number of connected businesses does not grow the number of things Clockin has to operate.

The in-house route, as the study describes it

Clockin looked at building and maintaining the relevant integrations itself and called it unrealistic. The study names the three things it would have cost:

  • Significant resources to develop and maintain them
  • Product development slowed down
  • The team distracted from its core focus
The study reaches that conclusion before it mentions Maesn, which is what makes it worth quoting: it is the customer's own reading of the work, not a vendor's.
How Maesn solves it

One connection, and every new accounting system comes with it

Two reads to find out who the invoice is made out to, one write to put it where it will be booked. The same three calls against every connected system, through one API.

Reads
The counterparty the invoice names
Get CustomersGet Suppliers
Writes
The draft invoice itself
Post Invoice
The three endpoints the study publishes, in the order the workflow uses them.

What comes out of the write is a draft, and the study is precise about that: workflows to create draft invoices based on project data. The document arrives where it will be checked and sent, in the system the business already runs its billing in, so the tracked hours turn into an invoice without anybody retyping them and without Clockin taking over the part its customer is liable for.

What makes those three calls the same three everywhere is the layer underneath. Every accounting system names and shapes a customer, a supplier and an invoice line differently, and the common data model resolves that before any of it reaches Clockin's code. Clockin writes the invoice once, and it writes it the same way whether the business behind it books in Sage Active, in Lexware Office or in sevdesk.

What changed

In two weeks the integrations brought in 800+ inbound leads

The figure is the study's own headline, and it is the only hard outcome number Maesn publishes about any of the four written-up customers.

800+
integration-driven inbound leads in two weeks
As published on the study

The study puts the other half of it in Clockin's own terms: the team can now focus fully on delivering value to customers and accelerating go-to-market. And Fabian Ebbert names the integrations as a driver for lead generation and for expansion into new markets, which is the same thing the figure above measures, said as a strategy rather than as a result.

The part that decides whether that repeats is coverage, and it can be measured rather than promised. Across the 29 connected accounting systems, ten are marked as accepting an invoice you write, and every one of those ten also reads customers and suppliers. Clockin's three published endpoints are therefore complete on all ten, and the three systems it named are three of them. The study publishes which three came first, not why, and the coverage says only what the remaining seven would take: the same three calls, nothing new to build.

Reading the counterparty before writing the invoice is a workflow of its own, and it is the same one wherever a product has to keep its own records lined up with an accounting system: customer and supplier data sync covers it on its own terms. The published outcome here is a demand number rather than an engineering one, which is why this study is the one go-to-market teams are pointed at.

Clockin case study FAQ

Common questions

Which accounting systems does Clockin connect to through Maesn?

Sage Active, Lexware Office and sevdesk. Those are the ones the integration runs on today rather than a limit: the same connection reaches every other accounting system Maesn supports, and it is the same three calls in each of them.

What does the integration actually call?

Three endpoints, as published on the study. Get Customers and Get Suppliers read the counterparty the invoice has to be made out to, because the invoice has to name it the way that accounting system already knows it, under the identifier that system assigned. Post Invoice then writes the invoice back into the same system.

Why a draft invoice rather than a finished one?

Because that is what the study says Clockin builds: workflows to create draft invoices based on project data. The tracked time and the line items arrive in the accounting system as a document ready to be checked, and whoever is liable for the invoice keeps the last word before it goes out. An invoice that has to be corrected afterwards costs more time than the one it saved.

Where does the figure of 800 inbound leads come from?

It is the headline of the study itself: 800+ integration-driven inbound leads in two weeks. Maesn publishes the figure, not the method behind the count, so this page does not explain how those leads were attributed. It is the only hard outcome number published about any of the four written-up customers.

Did Clockin consider building the integrations itself?

Yes, and the study publishes the conclusion in one word: unrealistic. Developing and maintaining all the relevant integrations would have tied up significant resources, slowed product development and pulled the team away from its core focus. That judgement is in the study before Maesn is mentioned in it.

Can another product that bills tracked work use the same setup?

The objects are the same for anything that turns work into an invoice: the customer the invoice is made out to, the counterparty behind it, the invoice and its lines. What differs per product is which accounting systems your own customers run, and that is a coverage question rather than an integration one.
Ship your ERP and accounting integrations. Connect once.
Book a demo